5. Peripheral and main giant telephone granulomas of one’s jaws: a demographic analysis. Dental Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Dental Radiol Endod 2007; -43. [ Links ]
Layfield LL, Shopper TP, Weir JC
six. Naderi New jersey, Eshghyar Letter, Esfehanian H. Activated sores of mouth area: A great retrospective study on 2068 cases. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:251-255. [ Links ]
eight. Zhang W, Chen Y, An enthusiastic Z, Geng Letter, Bao D. Activated gingival lesions: good retrospective examination of 2,439 circumstances. Quintessence Int 2007;-110. [ Links ]
8. Daley TD, Wysocki GP, Wysocki PD, Wysocki DM. The major epulides: clinicopathological correlations. J Can Dent Assoc 1990;-630. [ Links ]
9. Kfir Y, Buchner An excellent, Hansen LS. Activated sores of the gingiva. An excellent clinicopathological study of 741 cases. J Periodontol 1980;-661. [ Links ]
11. Shamim T, Varghese VI, Shameena PM, Sudha S. A retrospective research regarding gingival biopsied sores for the Southern Indian population: 2001-2006. Med Dental Patol Dental Cir Bucal 2008;-418. [ Links ]
thirteen. Ababneh KT. Biopsied gingival lesions inside northern Jordanians: Good retrospective data more than a decade. Int J Periodontics Restorative Reduction 2006;-393. [ Links ]
15. Macleod RI, Soames Jv. Epulides: an effective clinicopathological examination of a series of two hundred straight sores. Br Damage J 1987;-53. [ Links ]
sixteen. Buchner An effective, Shnaiderman An effective, Vared Meters. Pediatric surrounding reactive gingival sores: a retrospective study on Israel. Pediatr Reduction 2010;-492. [ Links ]
17. Zarei MR, Chamani G, Amanpoor S. Reactive hyperplasia of your jaws inside Kerman province, Iran: a review of 172 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;-292. [ Links ]
18. Salum FG, Yurgel LS, Cherubini K, De Figueiredo MA, Medeiros IC, Nicola FS. Pyogenic hookup bars Odessa granuloma, peripheral large phone granuloma and you will peripheral ossifying fibroma: retrospective study from 138 times. [ Links ]
Minerva Stomatol 2008;-232
19. Awange Would, Wakoli KA, Onyango JF, Chindia ML, Dimba EO, Guthua SW. Activated surrounding inflammatory hyperplasia of your own dental mucosa. East Afr Med J 2009;-82. [ Links ]
20. Anneroth G, Sigurdson An excellent. Hyperplastic sores of gingiva and you can alveolar mucosa. A study of 175 times. Acta Odontol Scand 1983;-86. [ Links ]
21. Katsikeris Letter, Kakarantza-Angelopoulou Elizabeth, Angelopoulos AP. Peripheral monster cellphone granuloma. Clinicopathologic study of 224 the instances and you can breakdown of 956 stated instances. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;-99. [ Links ]
twenty-two. Mighell AJ, Robinson PA, Hume WJ. Peripheral giant mobile granuloma: a clinical examination of 77 instances from 62 patients, and you may books opinion. Oral Dis 1995;1:12-19. [ Links ]
twenty four. Andersen L, Fejerskov O, Theilade J. Dental icon phone granulomas. An ultrastructural study of the fresh new vessels. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A great 1975; -76. [ Links ]
It’s believed far more a keen RHL than simply a beneficial neoplasm. Clinically, it looks because a great nodular mass, pedunculated otherwise sessile, easy, which comes from the newest interdental papilla, pink otherwise red-colored, that can become ulcerated 2 . Histologically, it’s consisting of cellular fibroblastic cells and creation from mineralized products: bones, cementlike procedure otherwise dystrophic calcifications cuatro . PGCG is entirely an excellent lesion of your own nicotine gum and/or alveolar mucosa. It appears to be as a growth from nodular frequency, painless, purple in order to blue-red-colored, pedunculated otherwise sessile. Histologically, it includes an expansion out-of large multinucleated cells and you will a good proliferation from mesenchymal tissue, from the prominent vascularization, abundant hemorrhage and you will hemosiderin dumps during the periphery of one’s lesion. it may establish signs and symptoms of persistent tenderness and you will areas of development regarding reactive limbs as well as dystrophic calcifications 2-5 .
RHL distribution based on gender PGCGs was indeed more regular within the males (51.6%), however, every rest of the lesions was basically more prevalent inside the people, that have 70.7% to have FH, 79.3% getting PG, and 57.step 1 % to possess POF. Buchner mais aussi al.16 found comparable leads to one another people and children, in which RHL also are more common in females, except for PGCG. Even in the event Buchner means differences between genders which are just like ours, his FH commission for women is gloomier than in our very own analysis (57.7% versus. 70.7%). Zarei et al. 17 , Salum mais aussi al. 18 , and you may Kfir et al. 9 , along with statement increased RHL volume in women, apart from PGCG, which had been large in males however, versus tall distinctions. Almost every other knowledge in addition to demonstrated extreme predominance of RHL in females 1, 5, 7, 14, 17, 19 , except for Anneroth et al.20 inside the Sweden, just who discover no difference between FH commission anywhere between genders.
4. Buchner An excellent, Hansen LS. This new histomorphologic spectral range of peripheral ossifying fibroma. Oral Surg Oral Med Dental Pathol 1987;-461. [ Links ]